Thorough look at Moats. If investors even considered half of all the variables here they would have a substantial advantage over 90% of investors. And make better decisions. But in the final analysis we don't know the future. And a part of investing is always going to be LUCK. Just thinking about these things helps us be more careful and considerate looking at all the angles when investing in a business. We don't have to be right even half the time to make large gains in wealth. Just like in baseball, if you get a hit 30% of the time you are a Hall of fame player candidate.
I fully agree but on the other hand for me, on the contrary, there is already a lot of short and high level (crap) to read which is entertaining but not adding a lot of value to grow in investing. I prefer the deep dives and extensive articles to get into the topics where the difference is made.
Very interesting article. I think people often overlook the company’s growth advantage period and simply compare the current P/E to historical averages — even though the business has already moved past its high-growth phase.
Thorough look at Moats. If investors even considered half of all the variables here they would have a substantial advantage over 90% of investors. And make better decisions. But in the final analysis we don't know the future. And a part of investing is always going to be LUCK. Just thinking about these things helps us be more careful and considerate looking at all the angles when investing in a business. We don't have to be right even half the time to make large gains in wealth. Just like in baseball, if you get a hit 30% of the time you are a Hall of fame player candidate.
Write her up on telegram
👇👇
KathrynLien2
Tell her I sent you
You are doing so deep dives and articles. I really like your general work, but it is far too long for me. Not sure if also other feel same as I do.
I fully agree but on the other hand for me, on the contrary, there is already a lot of short and high level (crap) to read which is entertaining but not adding a lot of value to grow in investing. I prefer the deep dives and extensive articles to get into the topics where the difference is made.
In my opinion, a large part can also be deleted. No added value. Many analyses are not so great in the rear-view mirror, e.g. inmode
Thanks to you all for the feedback! Yes this was a longer one (most articles are half the size) as I wanted to give the full picture from scratch.
they are always too long (for me). just my opinon.
Write her up on telegram
👇👇
KathrynLien2
Tell her I sent you
Write her up on telegram
👇👇
KathrynLien2
Tell her I sent you
Write her up on telegram
👇👇
KathrynLien2
Tell her I sent you
Write her up on telegram
👇👇
KathrynLien2
Tell her I sent you
Very interesting article. I think people often overlook the company’s growth advantage period and simply compare the current P/E to historical averages — even though the business has already moved past its high-growth phase.